Roots Global

Fund comparison

IMGA GV Portuguese Corporate Debt versus IMGA Portuguese Corporate Debt Fund

vs
IM Gestão de Ativos (IMGA) logo

IMGA GV Portuguese Corporate Debt

IM Gestão de Ativos (IMGA)

DebtOpen
IM Gestão de Ativos (IMGA) logo

IMGA Portuguese Corporate Debt Fund

IM Gestão de Ativos (IMGA)

DebtOpen

Residency permit & citizenship vs lock-up

IMGA GV Portuguese Corporate DebtNo lock-up — redeemableIMGA Portuguese Corporate Debt FundNo lock-up — redeemable~Year 6: typical naturalization decision

Golden Visa applicants must keep the qualifying €500,000 invested while the residency is active; naturalization timelines vary by case. Not legal advice.

Key facts, side by side

6 of 12 differ · marks a difference
IMGA GV Portuguese Corporate DebtIMGA Portuguese Corporate Debt Fund
Minimum investment
€100k
€500
Management fee p.a.
1.7%
1.5%
Performance fee
0%
~0%
Hurdle rate
~0%
~0%
Subscription fee
1.75%
0%
Redemption fee
3.5%
0%
Lock-up
None
None
Redemption
Daily
Daily
Fund term
Not disclosed
Not disclosed
Target return
Not disclosed
Not disclosed
Fund size
€3.4M
€48.8M
Inception
Jan 6, 2026
Apr 12, 2024

What the fees add up to

€21k€42k€63k€84kStartY1Y2Y3Y4Y5Y6Y7Y8€77k€60k
IMGA GV Portuguese Corporate DebtIMGA Portuguese Corporate Debt FundFees on €500k over 8 years — subscription + management only

Constant-balance illustration on a €500,000 Golden Visa subscription. Performance fees, redemption fees and fund-level costs are excluded — verify the full stack in each fund's prospectus.

For US investors

  • Accepted

    Unconfirmed

  • PFIC

    Unclear

  • QEF statements

    Unconfirmed

  • IRA route

    Unconfirmed

  • Accepted

    Unconfirmed

  • PFIC

    PFIC expected, no QEF reporting confirmed

  • QEF statements

    Not provided

  • IRA route

    Unconfirmed

Research coverage

76%

data completeness

3 fund documents linked · 3 sources cited

Full profile & sources →
85%

data completeness

5 fund documents linked · 7 sources cited

Full profile & sources →

This comparison restates researched data side by side — it is not a recommendation of either fund. Facts marked with a dash or "not disclosed" were not published; how much weight any difference deserves depends on your situation.